Tuesday, January 26, 2016

Icarus

I wondered how long it would take me before I wrote Marie a sonnet. This one took an hour and a half over lunch today. (Well, then a few hours later I came back to make some minor improvements to the scansion and in a couple other spots.)

You have to realize that in a way it's really cheeky of me to send Marie a sonnet. When we were in college she knew far more about poetry than I did and read a lot of it. She also wrote. Time and again she would give me a piece by one of her favorite feminist poets -- or by herself -- and I would flounder around helplessly not understanding it. As a side note, none of these poems ever rhymed, and none was in iambic pentameter. Not that that's a bad thing.

The images came to me because the tug between safety and risk is a big deal for Marie: it is a big part of how she understand her life. She said that when she first heard from me last fall she strongly considered not writing back, because she felt that engaging with me again would be emotionally unsafe. The course of prudence was clearly to keep silent. But then she reflected that she had been taking the safe course of action for several years by now, and all it had bought her was safety ... and stasis. Maybe it was time to risk something, ... just a bit.

Anyway, I thought about that for a while and decided to put it like this:


You know the fate of Icarus too well:
Those wings his father made, that let him go
Too near the sun. Wax melted. And he fell,
Smashing his body on the rocks below.
 
For safety you should live life on the ground:
A house, a yard, some money set aside,
With walls and fences built up all around –
A fine and private place where you can hide.
 
And yet you’ve met me on this precipice.
Our wings are stoutly made and bound with tar.
It’s sudden death if we but step amiss.
To skulk back down is safer, sure, by far.
 
But look, my love, and see the boundless sky.
Come take my hand – and leap! – and let us fly.    

Monday, January 25, 2016

I have a new girlfriend

Yup. Marie.

She still lives 1100 miles away. But maybe I shouldn't have taken her quite at her word when she expressed all the strong reasons she didn't want a new romantic partner.

Not sure when we will get a chance to see each other. She's going to call me Wednesday evening, which will be the first time we have heard each other's voices since the early 1990's. This has all been by e-mail.

You remember back in December when she said she wanted nothing to do with me, but I could write if I wanted to? At the time I characterized that slim permission as "a glimmer of hope." Probably I should have characterized it as winning. The only thing she would allow me to do was write? Skin me alive, boil me in oil, but whatever you do don't throw me in that briar patch .... 

I shouldn't gloat. But it has been a couple of years since Debbie left. Maybe it's time to find out if I have learned how to handle romances a little better and with fewer bad habits.

It's also true that there is something intoxicating about the challenge of seduction. Wish I were a little younger so that I felt more desperate urgency about the sex at the end of it all. But it will be great to see Marie again, to be friends with her again ... and maybe to handle bed a little better than I did before.
  

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

I think I've been forgiven

Back in this letter to Marie, I said I wouldn't ask her forgiveness for acting like such a shit during the time we knew each other. A while later she wrote back saying fine, then she wouldn't worry about giving it.

But really, I think we're there.

I told you about this e-mail that I got on New Year's Day. I replied. I was planning to keep you up to date on the continuing conversation, but that's going to be a little impractical. The next exchange was a week later, but it has rapidly turned into one or more e-mails back and forth every day or two. Some of these are very long. (She sent me one -- her version of what happened between us and after -- that came to seven pages when copied into MS Word. Her version is very different from mine, and actually I look better in hers. Just a bit.)

Oh, ... and we are signing off our e-mails to each other with "Love".

I don't think it's turning into a romance ... certainly not a conventional one. She lives 1100 miles from here and very emphatically is not looking for a romantic partner. Neither am I, though not as emphatically.

But I think she has gotten past being mad at me.

Some day I'll get around to posting the rest of the back story ....
  

Saturday, January 16, 2016

Long and angsty

POSTED THE EVENING OF DECEMBER 14, 2016.

It took Marie a few weeks to reply to this letter here, but she finally did. And this really got our conversations under way ....

================

Dear Hosea,

So. I’ll take Robin McKinley’s advice- “Begin in the middle and work your way out to the edges—don’t be stuffy.”

So the middle I’ll start with is your first question. You wrote, “What am I still overlooking?” And the answer is, in a word, me.

We’ll see how many pages I can expand that one word out to. (I have confidence in my abilities!)

But see, I don’t recognize myself in what you wrote at all. Maybe this is part literary pose or psychological gambit—apologies are rarely better received for being full of details of how the second party was really at fault too. But I come across in what you write as some sort of Platonic ideal of Loving and Understanding Womanhood or something: “Time and again… you offered me your heart in honest, vulnerable trust.” “Far better than I deserved, you cared enough to get closer than that.” “Inside, I was thrilled that you cared enough to help me out of the prison I had built for myself.”

Um. No. Yes, I was in love with you—but I hadn’t a clue, when I was 18, that you felt yourself in a self-built prison. Or indeed that you were at all dissatisfied with how you were interacting with others, including me. About as far as I got was that you might be shy about making the first move sexually. I didn’t even have the courage to offer you my heart, because I didn’t assume that you would want it (nor was I admitting to myself the true nature of my feelings for you). What I thought was, that your willingness to talk with me intensely one-on-one meant that you were “interested” in me, as I was in you, and that if I offered you my BODY you’d be happy I made the first move.

Here’s how I remember the conversation: I was panicking a little because I thought Ren Fayre would be the last chance before we were too busy with studying/finals to do anything. So I inveigled you away from our friends up to the privacy of my own room on the pretext of getting more wine—which you said you didn’t want anyhow, but you came with me. Then I said I wanted to tell you something rather personal, and you muttered something which only the most inveterate optimist would take as encouragement. And I said, “I find you very attractive.” This was, of course, your cue to leap on me with cries of lust, which you signally failed to do. Whereupon I said, I think, “You can do with that what you want,” and you said, “I don’t know what to say.” (I might have the order switched.) Exeunt omnes from my bedroom, and then you came over faint on the stairs.

If you understood at the time that I was offering my heart as well as my body, you understood more than I did myself—though it was true that you had it. In any event, I hardly think my communication qualified as a model of honest, vulnerable trust. But how could it have been, when I wasn’t capable of being honest with myself?

Skip ahead in your letter, when you wrote of how you “froze,” and how “I didn’t know what I felt. But that’s crazy—how can you not know what you feel? I had to know. Only I didn’t. I had to say something. Only I couldn’t. So I got more anxious… and froze harder.. and the seconds ticked away. Into minutes. Into hours, weeks, years.”

See, the parts of your letter that you said were crazy and impossible to understand or believe, were the parts that were the easiest for me to understand. Because they are familiar. Because that’s how I was, and unfortunately still am, about physical intimacy. Only, when I was 18, my whole self-image depended on denying that.

I was fine, just fine. My mom’s molesting me had had no long-term effects. I had no problems with either physical sex or romantic relationships. Okay, so I couldn’t orgasm, and froze whenever I tried to masturbate, and got anxious and ashamed anytime I felt physically aroused, and never dated when I was in high school, and had a panic attack the one time someone tried to kiss me, but that didn’t mean anything was wrong with me. Self-abuse didn’t count anyhow; it would be different with a partner. And the no-dating was just that in my high school all the girls who were really serious about college put off having serious relationships (so that meant we didn’t have sex, because of course one would only have sex if you were serious about someone—what, it’s not like someone would do sex for fun!). And then I got to college and one of the first thing I did was to prove myself normal by getting myself a boyfriend. With whom, of course, I would naturally engage in free love. But who understood that I was a virgin, so he didn’t try to advance things very fast. And I broke up with Mac not because his “not very fast” was still sexually aggressive enough to send me into panic attacks, but for VERY VERY GOOD REASONS that had nothing to do with being afraid to follow through on what I said, what I told him, what I told myself I wanted. What I did want, even. But panicked anytime I tried to do anything about.

Panic attack is a bit of misnomer, technically. I didn’t have trouble breathing or anything like that. I just, well, froze. Freeze. I stiffen, and go numb in my body, and emotionally—either numbness, or some mingling of shame and fear and grief. “Frigid” as a word for sexual dysfunction has a lot of resonance for me.

And of course you were safe for me to fall in love with—excuse me, to become interested in, since that’s all I was admitting to—because you weren’t sexually aggressive at all.

Now, the weird thing is, I haven’t panicked or frozen the times (since Mom) I’ve been threatened with actual rape. I’ve been scared, but legitimately scared, and it didn’t keep me from acting. I suppose it’s because there was no conflict about what I should do—I knew I had the right to defend myself, and so I could.

But, see, Mom—she didn’t force me. I asked her to stop, but I didn’t make her stop. I didn’t understand what she was doing—she was touching me “down there” which wasn’t supposed to happen, but good girls always obey their parents, so I did. My sister or my brothers weren’t “good” like I was; they would have fought her and gotten away; I was a good girl, and so I didn’t. It was only when I was in 8th grade and started to have sexual feelings myself that I realized—that my feelings were sexual, that what I was doing to myself was sexual, and therefore that what she had done had been. At which point I came up with the word “molested” and realized it applied, and realized that I would have had a right to resist back when it happened. Only, then I thought that my masturbating and having feelings proved I had deserved what she had done (why else would God have allowed such a thing to happen—after an AWANAS Bible study no less?—unless he knew in advance that I would deserve it?). So I made myself stop having feelings, and have never been able to undo it.

An aside—is it true Wife became aborn-again Christian? I REALLY hope that, if so, you didn’t let her poison your sons’ minds about sex. I really think I would have dealt much better with my sexual trauma, maybe not become frigid, if I hadn’t been extremely religious at that time. (Conversely, I might never have become an atheist had I never been molested—a truly frightening thought. Though possibly God’s obvious failure to protect me from Mom’s other abuses or to cure her alcoholism, no matter how much I prayed, might have had the same effect. As well as the other failures of my born-again minister uncle, the AWANAS leader, and the priests when I went to them for help dealing with her….)

Oh—but in the world-as-it-is I did become an atheist, and then later a feminist. And the feminists, unlike the churches, said that women were allowed to have sexual feelings. In fact, it was wrong for us not to.

Oops. By then I was frigid, and now THAT was wrong.

Maybe it’s because I thought my having sexual feelings proved I had deserved to be molested (after all, either way I was polluted. And if I was polluting myself, I had no right to complain that someone else had polluted me first), or maybe it’s because she didn’t use force, just moral authority. I could have resisted, but I didn’t realize I had a right to. But I also got very mixed up about coercion and consent, and intent and fantasy. I felt that to APPROACH someone who was unwilling or uninterested was the same as to force them. In fact even to THINK ABOUT them was really the same.

And indeed, on the receiving side, the few people I’ve ever tried to be physically intimate with—I always had to be interested in them first, before anyone made an approach. Any time someone’s made a pass at me who I wasn’t already thinking about, I—

Well, froze, like I said. But I’ve never, even once, unfrozen at all, even mentally, towards anyone who’s surprised me with a sexual suggestion or gesture. Even if I thought they were attractive, even if I was lonely or horny or wanting to get involved with someone.

On the other hand, it’s not permissible for me to make an approach either. THAT’S DOING WHAT MOM DID TO ME.

You’ll observe a certain problem with this, but since part of me is a twelve-year-old who thinks no one SHOULD have sex anyhow, that part of me regards the problem as a solution….

In practice, the only times I’ve managed to end up in bed with someone (regardless of how it turned out once we were), we’ve circled around for a while eying each other and verifying the other’s eying, and then usually I make the final approach.

Which, of course, is what I thought I was doing with you, that Ren Fayre. If I had realized I would take you by surprise, I never would have approached you. Not because I didn’t want to be rejected, because I seriously felt that approaching someone who wasn’t interested was the same as raping them. I thought that you were incredibly forgiving to be willing to TALK to me ever again after doing something so heinous as to admit to interest in you when you didn’t return it.

You’ll notice I wasn’t quite sane on that issue.

(That’s where writing one of my fan-fiction stories was cathartic; I got really clear that Severus having sexual fantasies, however ugly, about raping Lily, was actually distinct from his raping her. And that, therefore, my having sexual fantasies was different from my acting on them. And that forcing is different from asking, as long as the other party is free to say no. It’s only if the other party isn’t free, as I felt I wasn’t free to say no to anything my mom did, that even asking can be coercive.)

But see, this all makes a lot of your specific regrets irrelevant, Hosea.  

You wrote of beating yourself up emotionally after I propositioned you. “I wanted to run back to you, to hold and be held, to open all my walls. I also knew that after you had made yourself so vulnerable, every hour I waited was a dagger in your heart. So not only did I want to run back to you, but I knew that I had to. I knew it was cruel not to.”

Only, see—if you had, you would have run yourself headfirst into the meat grinder of MY problem. Once you demonstrated that you hadn’t already been thinking about me that way, my reflexive response was OMG I’ve just tried to rape him. It would have made no sense to me if you’d subsequently come back to me and said, “After reflection, yes”—as I said, even now I’ve never actually done that. I have no idea what I would have done, but I don’t think it would have been conducive to your further emotional opening. And your staying away wasn’t a dagger, because I wasn’t waiting for you to reconsider.

In fact I tried VERY VERY HARD for months after that to persuade myself that I’d given up any untoward feelings for you WE WERE FRIENDS JUST FRIENDS. A lot of my craziness the next year came when I reluctantly had to admit to myself that my feelings for you were, um, perhaps still more complicated and intense than JUST FRIENDS comprised. Whereupon I told myself that I was obsessed with you, and if only I could pinpoint the nature and origin of my obsession I could free myself from it…..

So my first guess as to what I would have done if you HAD gotten up the courage to approach me after fainting is that I would have pulled OH NO I ONLY HAVE FEELINGS OF FRIENDSHIP FOR YOU REALLY on you. To, I assume, your confusion and distress.

Whereas, if you hadn’t fainted; if you’d responded as I expected and wanted you to, with shy gladness that I’d broached the matter….

I assume I’d have treated you as I did Mac, and those other people I tried to get intimate with before my first round of therapy, post-college, after I admitted to myself that I wasn’t ALL RIGHT NO PROBLEMS WHATSOEVER MOVE RIGHT ALONG HERE where sex was concerned.

In fact, as I did treat you your senior year, when you did get up the courage to kiss me. Tried to be intimate with you, got aroused, froze in mid-caress, and broke it off before we could try to “go all the way” without admitting, either to you or to myself, that the problem (or the primary problem) was the sex, not you. [Hosea adds: I remember the story a little differently, here.]

In fact the proximate cause of everything going south that fall, from my point of view, was when I asked if you’d seen it coming, seen us drifting in the direction of intimacy, and you said no. Which I interpreted as meaning that you hadn’t thought about becoming physically involved with me before you did, and that therefore, obviously, once you DID stop to give it some thought, you’d realize you didn’t want me. So all that remained was to wait in despair until you figured that out.

Which, years later, I thought was a crazy thing to have assumed: why would not seeing it coming prove that you really weren’t interested? Some people—lots of people—pretty much anyone sane on the issue, really—would have reacted to your answer by determining to make you want them now, to try to make it rewarding enough for you to want to continue what you’d drifted into.

Talk about self-fulfilling prophecies—how could you want me when all I was thinking about was how soon you would wise up and dump me like you clearly wanted to only just hadn’t figured out yourself? I really told myself this: I cared about having a relationship with you, it was important to me, therefore I paid attention to what was happening between us, saw us drifting towards a physical relationship, was frightened by the prospect but wanted it enough to try despite my fear. You didn’t see it coming, therefore you weren’t paying attention, therefore it wasn’t of any importance to you and you didn’t care. Which meant I actually believed, during the period before you fulfilled my expectations and told me it wasn’t working, that the reason you hadn’t already done so was because you didn’t care enough about the issue (me) to think about it (me) long enough to realize you really didn’t want it (me).

In other words, your not breaking up with me at once was, to me, the final proof you really didn’t care. Ain’t logic wonderful?

It’s only writing it here that I see that it’s actually perfectly consistent. It’s how I was, so of course I assumed it’s how you were. And it’s the rule: anything (sexual) that takes someone by surprise HAS to be intrinsically unwelcome, even if they don’t understand what’s going on well enough to resist it openly at first…. Indeed, especially if they don’t understand well enough to resist openly at first.

But, see, I raised the issue with you. Because I was afraid and wanted reassurance? Or because I wanted an excuse to tell myself it wouldn’t work so I could back out before my sexual incapacity became obvious to both of us?

Both, I rather think now. And also, of course, I pretty much HAD to force you into rejecting me overtly (which you hadn’t actually done before—fainting may not be encouragement, but it’s also not an explicit rejection—as indeed, you say now, you didn’t want it to be). To prove that you could and would.

Aargh, short version of the rest of my sexual life. So. I graduated college unhappily aware that maybe I had some issues I perhaps had to work on. And started therapy. Fortunately, along with issues relating to my mom’s drinking and my dad’s suicide and being molested, you came up in my sessions. I say fortunately, because I’d already gotten most of the way to admitting that my “obsession” with you was simply that I was in love with you when I called R to find out how you were doing at graduate school, to my shock got you on the phone instead, and you told me you were going back home in part to be with a “special friend.” That would not have been a good way to discover the nature of my feelings for you.

Were you really aware all along of what was going on with me? Your letter makes it sound that way, but I don’t know how much of that is retroactive analysis. But of course you wouldn’t have had my reasons to need to deny the nature of my feelings at the time.

So. Worked extensively with my counselor, got through some things. Met a guy through friends who felt possible, tried it with him, to my delight was able to achieve sexual intercourse. Penetration, even!!! Of course I still clicked off my feelings in the middle, but that part would come with time and practice. A month later I took the job with a company that transferred me to Salt Lake City, away from both therapist and boyfriend, but that was okay because I was fine now, just fine, all fixed.

Woke up in 1990 to realize I hadn’t been with anyone since, was living in a city I hated, doing work that was fundamentally meaningless to me (though I was decent at it), my friendships were mostly quite shallow, all I really had in my life was an adequate income and I didn’t value that. So, Landmark. Which is really good about supporting you about getting in motion in your life, and keeping in motion. Setting goals, and staying in movement on them despite one’s fears. So. I decided to change careers to something that was meaningful to me. I tried actual dating—blind dating, even. I contacted you. I reconciled with my mom (who had, in the intervening years, finally done an alcohol treatment program that stuck—but I had never trusted her sobriety, or her). I forgave her for molesting me, even. I moved from Dallas to the Northwest. And I got involved with someone I met through Landmark in Seattle, who was very patient about my sexual problems.

Only—he had to continue to be patient about them, because they didn’t shift. The best I managed was to increase the length of time I could stay engaged. And I didn’t love him, and realized I wasn’t going to fall in love with him, and staying involved with someone just to be involved with someone—that didn’t seem right. And when the sex wasn’t even working… So I broke up with him, but there wasn’t anyone else I wanted. Well, except. And the blind dates had been a horror to me. (And probably to the perfectly-nice-enough guy who tried to kiss me.)

Plus, of course, I had utterly failed in my first teaching post, and I said working as a substitute would be a way to work on my classroom management skills so I could go back and try again, but I could see after a year or two that I was getting better, but not good.


So it seemed to me that most of the risks I had taken hadn’t had a very good return, so I didn’t want to take risks any more. Which is not an attitude that Landmark supports, so I stopped.

But as far as the sexual issues were concerned—well, Landmark always said it wasn’t therapy. So maybe another round of therapy would do the trick. Early 2000’s, this would be. I was active in Peace Action, trying to stop the Iraq War (which anyone who was paying attention could see Bush was starting on false pretenses), working at [the place I still work today], gardening…. And the therapy—well, I felt better about some things. But the frigidity—that wasn’t altering. And then it hit me how old I was. That even if I did conquer my fear of sex, I was already too old to have children. Even if I was cured totally the next week, I’d missed out on my chance to have a normal marriage-plus-kids. I’d never been sure I wanted that, but I felt deprived to realize it could never be an option. And so I decided it was all hopeless, and gave up.

Which pretty much destroyed my relationship with my mom. I revoked having forgiven her for molesting me. I felt like, as long as I pretended I was okay sexually, or hoped that someday I’d be okay, I could forgive her. But now I was acknowledging that what she’d done had consequences I apparently couldn’t recover from. She’d essentially crippled my sexuality, in the service of a moment’s gratification of her own. I was hugely angry; it seemed grossly unfair that SHE’D committed the crime, and I was the one suffering life-long punishment.

She responded to my anger by deciding that I’d made the whole thing up. I was crazy, she had no memories of doing such a thing, she never would do such a thing, and besides she likes men.

This did not make things better between us.

I’d never tried talking about the abuse with her at any length—not the sexual abuse, not the physical or verbal abuse, not the neglect. She tried, if I remember, to talk with me a little about the last, to apologize, when she was doing her twelve-step program in the mid-nineties—but I didn’t trust her and didn’t want to indulge her in any conversation about painful matters. And if she even tried to apologize for any specific actions I don’t remember that at all. The only two times I mentioned the sex abuse at all—once when I was 17, once when I first did Landmark—I mentioned it, she said she didn’t remember (which I easily believed—she had a lot of alcoholic blackouts in those days), but she didn’t try to deny that it might have happened without her remembering it. Of course those two times I wasn’t attacking her about her action.

Her denial made me angrier. I said I’d tell the family; she said she’d disinherit me if I spread such lies. I said fine.

One of my aunts had a fairly long conversation with me detailing her reasons for thinking that my mom herself had probably been sexually abused. (Which hypothesis does in fact make sense of a lot of my mom’s behavior—she’d be a good exemplar of the sexually-acting-out victim, as I am of the sexual avoider.) But she was enough younger than mom that she was going by inference rather than observation. Everyone else pretty much ignored what I said.

I could be around her, those last several years, basically only by ignoring who she was. If she was just a little old lady in a wheelchair with oxygen in her nose (she died of COPD), pathetically eager to be loved by everyone and being super nice and empathetic and charming to everyone around her to make them love her, my reflexive be-nice-to-little-old-ladies programming would kick in and I could be nice to her. (God knows how these reflexes will play out when I’m a little-old-lady too!) But as soon as I’d think “that’s mom” or she’d do anything to remind me, I’d be in the middle of my anger again.

I couldn’t go to see her when I knew she was dying; all I wanted from her was her to acknowledge the wrong she’d done me, and what she wanted from me was to pretend it had never happened.

My brothers and sister, though—since mom’s death we’ve been closer. A lot is because, when mom’s will was read, I hadn’t been disinherited. I said, why not, she said she was going to? Turns out she did talk about cutting me out, and they said no. All three of them. They said the estate should be split four ways, and it was.

Mind, the money is sitting doing nothing in a CD because I’m reluctant to touch it, But it helps me with them.

The other thing was, I’ve been using fanfic to explore some issues, and one of the things that I finally got clear on—well, with my siblings I realized that we hadn’t had at all the same experience of mom in our teen years. Even though they lived through her alcoholism with me, her verbal abuse, the fear and mortification of not knowing what horrible or humiliating or embarrassing thing she would do when she was drunk. So we had that as a commonality.

But I was the only one she molested, and as far as I recall I was the only one she ever knocked off a chair. And it’s not just the sexual problem that I developed as a result that made my experience of her different after she did that.

The thing is, once she had molested me—or more precisely, once I understood that that’s what she had done—there wasn’t anything I could believe her incapable of doing. Not if she was drunk enough. I lived for years in fear that she would try to molest me again—or try it with my little sister or brother—and I watched her, in fear, for years ready to intervene if she tried.

But I feared other things too.

For example, she always had this habit of saying, when she was angry at one of us, “I wish you were dead! I could just shoot you!”

So when I was a little kid this was very unpleasant and hurtful to hear. But of course I didn’t take it as a serious threat—she would never actually act on it.

But after she molested me I couldn’t assume that anymore. If she’d do that, she could do anything. If she was drunk enough. Even if it was something she’d never even think about doing, sober.

Which meant that I went through my adolescence with a much higher level of fear than my brothers and sisters, even while we endured (otherwise) the same experiences. We all saw her do things while drunk that she wouldn’t do sober—but only I seriously believed that she might do ANYTHING. My body must have been saturated with adrenaline, for years. Or rather, not steadily, not all the time, but any time she approached black-out drunk.

And, most of all, my siblings don’t know, don’t have any way to register, that my experience was different from theirs. That I was experiencing terror plus disgust, discomfort, mortification, while they only felt the last three. We all went through the same thing; why am I alone overreacting? They have to feel that, a bit.

So the fact that they are still supportive of me means more.

Aargh. Aren’t you glad you asked?

But, back, finally, to your letter. You, of course, are benefitting now from my mom’s failure; your willingness to apologize means more, in contrast with her refusal.

You said you wouldn’t ask for my forgiveness because you had done nothing to earn it. So fine, I won’t worry about offering it. But you’ve done something else—maybe made it possible for me to forgive myself.

Because the anger and bitterness I’ve felt toward you (and you’re quite right, of course, I’ve felt a lot) is nothing compared to what I’ve felt over you. Towards myself.

I felt I should never have loved you. I felt I deserved all the pain I got, because my love for you had been crazy. Stupid. Self-destructive, and worse, self-deceiving. I felt I should have turned off my feelings (y’know, like the song in “The Book of Mormon”: “Turn it off, like a light switch”—isn’t that how feelings work?) once I knew you didn’t want me. Which means, er, after that Ren Fayre. Or before, since I should have seen the truth from the start. Or after your senior year. Or.

But at any rate, loving you made me no better than a stalker. I should have given up my delusions that you could possibly have feelings for me. (The phrase from the end of “Pale Horse, Pale Rider” has always resonated: “for knowing it was false she yet clung to the lie, the unpardonable lie of her bitter desire.”)

I should have left you alone.

But now you confirm, you didn’t want me to.

In fact, reading your letter, in retrospect your desires, and what you communicated to me at the time, look remarkably consistent over the course of our relationship. You didn’t know how to deal with my feelings, or with what I wanted of you. You didn’t want to deal with them; they frightened you. But you didn’t actually want me to withdraw them entirely either, and you didn’t at all want me to go away.

Making my feelings for you, well, still probably stupid, and (given my own issues) doomed. But at least not based totally on self-deception. So maybe not unpardonable.

So. Thank you for giving me an opportunity to forgive myself.
   

Sunday, January 3, 2016

When is it abuse?, 2

Another thought -- briefly, because it is late.

When I read the comments around Marie's story (the one about James Potter being an abusive husband), someone remarked that a female fan had commented to J. K. Rowling herself that James Potter seems a brutal bully, and Rowling answered with some remark like, "Don't tell me that means you don't like him. Come on -- you're a woman, I'm a woman, we both know better than that."

What does this mean? Does Rowling think all women like bullies, even if they say something different?

I don't know what Rowling thinks, but my first thought is of a distinction that I remember reading about on a website somewhere. (And remember -- if it's on the Internet, it must be true.) The author of this webpage -- a woman writing for other women -- argued that there are two fundamentally different kinds of men in the world:

  • the men women marry
  • the men with whom women have great sex
Anyway, the author said that these two kinds of men are emphatically not the same!
  • The men that women marry are caring, compassionate, and responsible; they will help out with the children, hold down long-term jobs, and make a good place to live. They are also boring.
  • The men with whom women have great sex are dashing, daring, dangerous, and exciting. But typically they are also unreliable, narcissistic, and violent. These are not guys who are going to show up for PTA meetings.
So what does this mean about James Potter? Is it possible that Rowling wrote him to be the kind of guy who would -- in real life -- end up beating his wife and children, just because she wanted to make him daring and dashing, and because she didn't have to worry about domesticating him? (After all, she knew he was going to die off soon.)

And why did I marry Wife? My own impression is that I'm one of the boring guys -- caring, compassionate, responsible and dull. But Wife? I have said in the past that I found her abusive. And God knows she could be unreliable, narcissistic, and violent. Did I marry her because she was exciting?

Yes. At least partly. There were a lot of factors that went into my marrying her, and some day I'll write down all the ones I can think of. But yes, that was one of them.

Maybe we are built to seek out those who end up abusing us. Kind of a depressing thought, no?
  

Saturday, January 2, 2016

When is it abuse?

Marie told me where to find some of the Harry Potter fan-fiction she has written, and I've been reading it. She writes well. The characters are sensitively drawn, they sound right, and her plots take the characters in interesting directions without violating what is "known" about them from the writings of J. K. Rowling herself. (The seven Potter books are described collectively as "the Canon".)

Sometimes "interesting" is a pallid understatement. For example, she raises the question whether it is possible to characterize James Potter (Harry's dad) as an abusive husband and Lily Potter as a battered wife, without violating anything about them that is known from the Canon. Then she writes a story which does exactly that; and in her comments on the finished narrative, she adds that it was disturbingly easy. I get the sense from her remarks that she thinks the "real James Potter" (if we can speak of such a person) probably was an abusive husband, even if Rowling claims in interviews that she thinks he's a great guy.

I was thinking about this story while out walking last night, and suddenly I found myself deep in an imagined conversation with Marie about my marriage ... an imagined conversation in which I was trying to defend myself against the charge that I systematically abused Wife, that I was (in fact) just as obvious an abuser as James Potter. It was not a pleasant conversation to be in.

(As an aside, ... am I the only one who does this? You'd think that if I were going to fantasize a conversation with somebody I hadn't seen in twenty-four years, I'd make it something that flattered my own ego. You'd think I would pretend that she had missed me all those years -- her plain remarks to the contrary notwithstanding. Or maybe I'd make a sexual fantasy out of it and then come home to masturbate. But no, I imagined an accusation -- one in which my explanations were peremptorily cut off as transparent excuses just like the ones all other abusive husbands use. "It wasn't my fault. She made me do it. Besides, I never hit her." It was really unsettling.)

In abbreviated form, the accusation was that a lot of the things I did to Wife were subtly abusive.
  • I paid all the bills, which sounds fine until we add that I went over every expense (e.g., every credit card) line by line and asked her to justify each one. I fought with her over any expense I disagreed with. And at one point I took her wallet away, with all her credit cards, so that she could not buy anything.
     
  • I asked how she spent her time. Where did she go? Who was she with? When she told me things that sounded like lies or didn't add up, I would cross-check the details. If I thought she was lying I would confront her and demand the truth.
     
  • At night after she went to bed, I read her e-mails and her text messages without her knowledge or permission. Most of the time I did not have her password and therefore had to hunt around in the guts of our home computer until I found how to get what I wanted. (But I never installed a key-logging program.) I made copies of the messages that mattered to me, so I could retrieve them later.
     
  • I almost never hit her. I remember that there were a couple of times that were line calls, and they were long enough ago that I don't actually remember the details of what happened. Therefore if I were asked in a court of law today whether I remember ever hitting her, I could honestly answer No under oath; if I were asked simply whether I ever hit her -- leaving out the qualifier about what I remember -- I couldn't honestly be certain.
Was this spousal abuse? Taken by themselves, these behaviors sound pretty bad. At best they mean treating a grown woman like a child, which is demeaning even if we talk about isolated cases. (And in truth I never treated either of our children this poorly.) To expect a grown woman, an educated professional with a master's degree from a great university, to put up with this treatment on a regular basis -- as a pattern, as a way of life -- sounds worse than demeaning. It sounds abusive. And this is how we lived, for years.

When I finally got a chance to defend myself (in this imagined conversation), my defense was that Wife was crazy.

This provoked another outburst from the imagined Marie. Of course! It was all the woman's fault! Isn't that what every abusive husband says? "My wife was crazy." Isn't that just like the lecherous husband in the 1950's telling his secretary "My wife doesn't understand me" just before he fucks her on the long table in the board room, after hours? Of course your wife was crazy! You can explain and excuse anything like that!

No. Really, she was crazy. And it was scary. If you can't believe me, that means you've never lived with somebody so crazy -- which is a good thing, I guess, except it means you have no bloody clue what I'm talking about.
  • Take the bills, for example. I didn't want to have to pay them all. It was a pain in the ass, and for the first couple years of our marriage she paid them all. I was content to let her take charge of this. That lasted until one day we started bouncing checks, because when she paid the phone bill (we owed some $35 that month) she wrote a check for over $800. I accused the bank of making a mistake, and they produced the physical check itself, as proof. Wife could not account for what had happened. Where did that three-digit number starting with an "8" come from? It wasn't our account number, it wasn't a transposition of any of the digits in the real bill, it wasn't the amount we owed on any other bill she paid that day. The number just appeared out of the blue. That was the last time I let her pay our bills. I figured if this kind of thing could happen with no warning and no explanation, the only way to protect against it was for me to pay all the bills. If we had not been married -- if we had had separate checking accounts and separate credit ratings -- I would have let her continue to do as she pleased. But not with my money and my credit.
  • I went over every expense because she bought things that made no sense.
    • One night after I had gone to bed she stayed up late on e-Bay and bid on $700 worth of blue jeans because the boys needed some new jeans. Why so many? She figured she'd be outbid on some of them. And she was, so the final bill was only a little over $400. That's a lot of used blue jeans. They boys outgrew them before they could outwear so many.
    • When we sold the house, we discovered boxes and boxes of things she had bought that we had to put straight into the trash, or give to charity. We had never opened them or used them ... but we owned them, because she got an idea one day and decided we "just had to have" something we never had any use for.
    • There are a lot more stories in this vein -- a lot more! -- but I'm not going to tell them because it will just make me angry, even these many years later.
  • I took away her wallet because ... well, I've already told you that story.
  • I asked her where she went and what she did because she slept around so much and then lied about it. The sleeping around bugged me. The lying made me crazy. I even asked her, "If you are sleeping around just say so -- it's better than lying." But she wouldn't. I spent the first year of this blog complaining about this topic, so maybe I don't have to go into a lot more detail now.
  • I read her e-mails and her text messages because I was genuinely afraid of what she might do online.
    • When she got involved with Boyfriend 5 -- who, you will recall, never actually existed -- early on she texted him her social security number and her birthdate and her mother's maiden name, all to prove that she "trusted" him because he was "afraid" that she didn't.
    • At another point she was all set to respond to an e-mail from somebody in Nigeria asking for her help because his little girl had cancer. "What?" I exploded. "Haven't you heard that this is the most common Internet scam in the world these days?" She looked at me in dead earnest and said, "But Hosea, what if there really is a little girl in Nigeria dying of cancer? Isn't it my job to help her any way I can?" I finally dissuaded her, but it wasn't easy.
    • Then there was the time she was going to steal the children and fly internationally to go meet Boyfriend 5 and live there forever with him. I hid the children's passports so she couldn't take them; but I am convinced that -- had I not known to do so -- she would have gone. So there would have been no Boyfriend 5 abroad to meet her, and she would have taken the children to a foreign country with no money and no provisions made in advance (all because she expected a reception she couldn't get). If they ever got back alive I could have had her arrested and thrown in jail (I think), but it would have been a hell of a risk to run. Fortunately she couldn't take the first step, because she couldn't even get tickets without their passports. Good thing I read her e-mail that night!
  • And as for hitting her ... all I can say is, you try living with her day and night for thirty years, and tell me if you never hit her! I'll bet my track record is better than yours, when all is said and done.
After all this my summary was that my actions didn't constitute classic abuse because I didn't want to exercise power over her but did it only for self-defense: now that we live in different places and have different bank accounts, I don't care any more what she does. On the other hand, I added, the evidence also shows that if I feel threatened I am capable of doing almost anything to defend myself.

In my fantasized conversation, Marie ended up unsure: unsure whether I abused Wife, and unsure whether she wanted to be my friend. After all, why would she be friends with a confessed wife-abuser? Again, since it was my fantasy you'd think I could have made it all work out so that she came round to my way of thinking at the end. But "unsure" was absolutely the best outcome I could get.

Maybe I just need to learn how to fantasize better. This particular fantasy was really depressing.
    

Friday, January 1, 2016

Dialogue with Marie

The dialogue continues.

This in itself is a good sign. My biggest worry in all this has been that she would shut down the discussion. That's why I was so pleased that she allowed me to write back, instead of telling me to buzz off. As long as I can write, I can try to win her back to being friends again.

And sure enough, I got a reply to this letter here ... this time in e-mail, which means she is now trusting me with her e-mail address. It's progress.
 
Happy New Year. Thank you for your latest letter. And stop idealizing me.

I cringed when I read your letter's opening, about my generosity; I had a nightmare after I mailed my response, my subconscious reproving me for how grudging and ungracious I had been.

Back when you first got involved with Wife and I asked what she was like, you said that she was like me. Bear that in mind, please.

One part of your letter made me laugh out loud--page three, where you wrote of your father and Falstaff and being an actor. Because it's not true that you consistently rejected me, precisely; it's rather that I felt, rather consistently, that I was only acceptable to you (/that you would only accept me- depending on whether I was feeling deficient in myself or feeling that your implicit requirement might possibly be unreasonable) in one role alone: that of appreciative audience.

So nice to know that our metaphors coincide.

It sounds like you're busy processing things, about yourself and about your past; my own experience is that that can't be done solely through introspection, that it works better if you bounce things off other people. I hope that you are seeing a counselor or have a support group or something.

If you'd like to read some of my fanfic, I have some published on ....

I will, in the fullness of time, answer your letter more fully. In the meantime, Happy New Year.

Marie


That was last night. This morning I replied as follows:

Dear Marie,

Once again, a Happy New Year. I'll keep this short.

I didn't mean to idealize you, but I recognize that's something I have a problem with so I will watch it. (Not just with you, I mean.) On the other hand, if you were beating yourself up over that letter then stop. You had reasons for writing as you did, and it could have been harsher. I was worried it was going to be, which is why I was so glad that it wasn't.

It's been a long time and I no longer remember why I said that Wife was like you. I don't think that now. But saying that is just the tip of a large iceberg, so I'll save explanations for some other time in case you are ever interested.

As you say, so nice to know that our metaphors coincide. (smile)

Busy processing things? In a sense yes. But it's not like I have a plan or an agenda ... not like I sat down one day recently and decided to rethink my life. The things I wrote you are things I have come to see bit by bit over a lot of years: some through introspection and others in conversation. You are right that other people's feedback can be a great help.

Thank you for the pointer to your fan fiction. [There followed some remarks about the specific stories.]

Sorry, I said I'd keep this short. I look forward to hearing from you again.

All the best,
Hosea

Holiday wrap-up

I just realized last night that I've written nothing about the holidays themselves. Time was when I always wrote some kind of Christmas post, but not this year. It's been all good, but I'm not sure how much of a story there is to tell.

The boys were with me for a week and a half, ending on Christmas Eve. I was off work most of that time because the company wants us to burn down our accumulated vacation as a cost-savings measure. So we talked; I did a little Christmas shopping and rather more Christmas baking. I made a big vat of persimmon jam (see, e.g., here). 

The three of us went to see "Star Wars 7" with Jack and Jill, and then afterwards had dinner at their place: no drunken carousing, but good food and lots of fun conversation. Then we drove to my mother's place (the same house she bought with my father 43 years ago) to have Christmas with her, plus Brother and his wife. It was a fun time for all, and on Christmas Eve I drove the boys to spend the remainder of the holiday with Wife. I spent several hours on Christmas Day at my volunteer work, and I have spent the ensuing week still off work (see remarks above) and watching a lot of movies. Maybe today I'll clean my apartment.

Not a lot to tell, but a pleasant couple of weeks.