Thursday, April 26, 2018

Bring your whole self to work

Today is Diversity Day at my company, so we had a potluck. That part was a lot of fun … plenty of good food, so how can you go wrong?
 
But one of the slogans for Diversity Day was, “Bring your whole self to work!” The idea is that the company should cultivate enough emotional safety that people feel free to be open about who they are … so that nobody has to hide their ethnicity or nationality or religion or sexual preferences because we’re all just one big happy family. Or something like that.
 
And I can’t help but wonder … really?
 
I should feel safe bringing my whole self to work? Let’s see, that includes …
  • Failed scholar
  • Failed husband
  • Multiple adulterer
  • Drinks too much
 
Also, less dramatically, I suppose I could add …
  • Permanently separated (but not divorced) from a Wiccan-Baptist-Mormon, bipolar, bisexual, promiscuous wife
  • Pagan-sympathetic, Christian-sympathetic crypto-Platonist attending a Buddhist meditation sangha
  • Eats too much
 
… Those things don’t make me look shocking or immoral … just kind of pathetic and boring.
 
I could talk about Sister Failure. That would sure draw a crowd. Of course it would draw them all to the other side of the building as people moved out of earshot, but still I suppose that constitutes a crowd.
 
Anyway, how is it supposed to be safe to bring all this to work? Also my boss is demoting me, supposedly to “rationalize” the org chart, which means that I’m looking for a relocation on the other side of the country. Should I bring all that in too? Hell, that part’s even work-related. But what do you bet that part’s all covered under confidentiality rules?
 
The potluck was nice. I’m always in favor of anything involving food. But the slogan? Sorry, I can’t believe that ….
 

Tuesday, April 17, 2018

What’s wrong with the “Purity Culture”? (a rant)

This really is a rant. It started as part of a letter to Marie, and it built up a head of steam until it was altogether out of control. What's more, I think it sounds like a sermon, and Heaven knows nobody ever asked me to preach a sermon on this, nor ever will. But what the hell, right? Nobody still reads this blog either, so it's a fine place to try out stuff like this. Don't tell me I didn't warn you.

[Begin in the middle of the letter. Marie had mentioned something about Purity Culture, and I took the bit in my teeth.]

... Because of course what I want to say is that training a girl to be afraid of sex is like owning a Lamborghini and only driving it to the corner market once a month for sprouts and tofu. The female sexual response is one of the most sublime creations on God's earth, proof for anyone who thinks in these terms that the Creator is not only beneficent but powerful and energetic and deeply creative beyond the wildest imagination of men. (Yes, in that context I mean "men".) The other exhibitions of Demiurgic power that are equally awe-inspiring are dangerous and deadly, like volcanoes and tornadoes and earthquakes. But the female sexual response is our size, it is healthy and life-giving, it enriches and fructifies our lives on every level you can imagine, while being as stultifyingly awesome as any volcano. To repress it, to fear it, to bottle it up, to deny it, and to teach others to do the same, is to spit in God's face. It is as treacherous as Judas selling Christ to the Sanhedrin, and as cowardly as Peter denying him thrice before cock-crow. If ever any human act were villainous and wrong, that is.

Of course, that doesn't mean you have to peddle it cheaply, or squander it carelessly. That doesn't mean you have to get drunk and pass out at a frat party so the boys can do you from all angles while you're unconscious and then post streaming videos on YouTube. It doesn't mean you have to pick up strange men in bars and then do them on the living room floor in front of your children. It doesn't mean you have to be callous or manipulative or uncaring, that you have to compete for the most notches on your bedpost or otherwise exploit yourself or others. It doesn't mean any of that; and so far as Christian teachers are saying you don't have to do squalid things that you will hate even as you are doing them, things that will cheapen and coarsen yourself in your own eyes ... so far as they are teaching that they are absolutely right.

But when they say that anything can cheapen you irreversibly, they have abandoned Christianity. At that point they have turned their backs on Jesus after spitting in his face and telling him they know better than he does; they have become Manichaeans, heretics, and heresiarchs. Because innocence is always an option. Forgiveness is always available, both from God and — what is often far more difficult — from yourself. 

There is more. God chooses different paths for different people. And God lets us choose for ourselves; then if we paint ourselves into a corner he can help us learn from it and move on. So if some girl does go hog-wild with her sexuality, if she does go crazy and do things that her family and church can't understand or approve, and that make them shake their heads in wonder ... that's not the end of the story! What happens next? Does she stay there for the rest of her days? (Theoretically possible but really unlikely.) Or does she get out of her system something she had to get rid of, and does she then learn from it how to lead a more mature life after? Does she maybe learn things that will let her help others who also find themselves careening towards dangerous and risky behaviors? Because if she can help people, even if she's outside the circle of her home church's morality pamphlets ... that too is the work of God. Rescuing people who are at risk in the sketchy margins of life — savingthem, redeeming them — that too is the work of God. And if she was strengthened and enabled to do that work by her own checkered and unconventional sexual history ... well, God works in mysterious ways, his ways are not our ways, and no human understanding is broad or deep enough to encompass his own. So our job in that situation, as bystanders and as her family and church community [supposing for the moment that those are the people I'm talking to], is to love her, to offer our supportif she wants it, and then to shut the fuck upand let God do the work that needs to be done by whatever means necessary....


See what I mean?




Sent from my iPhone

Monday, April 2, 2018

Career counseling, 2


A week ago I said I had figured out why career planning has always been so hard for me. Today I had another thought along the same lines.

Whenever I've thought about the issue in a grand way I've pitched it as "What am I supposed to be doing?" Then other times I've realized that's a really bad way to think about it. Still, in some form or other there is a lot of career advice out there that says to figure out what you love doing the most -- who you are -- and then do that.

Then this morning I had an idea about it. Can't remember if I've had this idea before or not. But basically ....
  • I've called myself a philosopher manqué because I spend (some of) my free time thinking about philosophical questions. But I realize that inside the general area of philosophy, an awful lot of those questions are about religion or theology.
  • I got interested in Greek mythology by the age of 4, and have never given it up.
  • I'm reasonably certain that part of what attracted me to Wife was precisely that she was Wiccan (at the time); it was interesting, exciting, different ... and not mundane.
  • And of course I've had experiences like this one.
And all of this makes me wonder ... am I wrong to think that I "naturally belong" in a university, in the liberal arts and sciences? Is it possible that -- to the extent I "belong" anywhere specific -- it's in Divinity?

Because you know, 150 years ago that wasn't a particularly strange career vocation. In some parts of the country it still isn't. And I wonder if maybe that's what I am particularly "made" for? Of course there's no way I would ever have pursued a pastoral or theological career. My father was a strident atheist back when I was growing up, and I would never have done anything to risk his ridicule. Pastoral or theological studies would have done just that.

But I wonder ... in an alternate universe, one where I grew up in a more conventionally devout household, is that the direction I would have gone?

There's no way to know for sure, of course, but I have been puzzling on it ever since. And of course now my dad is dead, so if I wanted to make a change there's no way he could ridicule me now from beyond the grave.

Hmmm.